Head-to-Head Comparison
MCP-Billing vs SayGM
Comprehensive feature analysis, ratings breakdown, platform compatibility, and community review comparison.
MCP-Billing
OAuth 2.1 + usage-based Stripe billing for MCP servers
No ratings (0 reviews)117 Upvotes
Detailed Feature Comparison Matrix
Compare Other Tools| Dimension | MCP-Billing |  SayGM |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Category | API | API |
| Community Rating | No ratings(0 reviews) | No ratings(0 reviews) |
| Community Upvotes | 117 votes | 5 votes |
| Supported Platforms | Web | Web |
| Tags & Focus | #Developer Tools#SaaS#GitHub#API | #Artificial Intelligence#Developer Tools#API |
| Maker / Company | Independent Developer | Independent Developer |
| Platform Verification | Community Listing | Community Listing |
About MCP-Billing
Self-hosted Next.js/TypeScript boilerplate: full OAuth 2.1 + PKCE, API key management with zero-downtime rotation, usage-based Stripe billing, and Redis rate limiting. 7 modules, 300+ tests. One-time €79, no revenue share, no platform lock-in. The metering core is free and open source on npm.
About SayGM
SayGM is a cheaper, private alternative to OpenRouter Most private AI claims are a paragraph on a privacy page. SayGM proves it instead: the gateway runs inside an Intel TDX enclave, so the chip itself signs a measurement of exactly what's running. One OpenAI-compatible endpoint gets you Claude, GPT, and Gemini, no rewrites. Closed models stay sealed for the maker alone; open models run inside the enclave too, so no one sees your prompt.